Third party real estate listing companies, too big to fail?
Broker makes a public statement
In a public declaration, San Diego-based Abbot Realty Group (ARG) President and Managing Broker, Jim Abbott released a video on YouTube explaining why their brokerage will no longer permit third party syndication sites like Trulia, Realtor.com and Zillow to syndicate their listings, but will continue to syndicate company listings to their local MLS, Sandicor. ARG’s announcement is the latest in a string of similar developments.
Abbot stated, “After three years of carefully examining internal metrics for the sites where our listings appeared, I categorically state the following – neither the home seller who has hired us to represent their property, or the potential home buyer, is remotely well served by listing syndicators. And here’s why – these sites are nothing more than slick advertising platforms. They often use fear and peer pressure to induce agents and brokers to sign costly long-term contracts for their lead generation services. Our industry is vigorously regulated by local, state and federal governments to protect the public, yet listing syndicators have no legal responsibility for the accuracy of the data they display.”
“We demand, however, that any marketing plan produce tangible results, not meaningless hits in cyberspace,” he later added.
Other brokers pull listings
Last fall, AGBeat broke the story that 75 big brokers were rumored to be considering refusal of syndication of their listings, suspecting that others would also follow. ARG’s plea for industry professionals to consider their own syndication and for buyers and sellers to do their homework is a more tangible, public-facing and viral proclamation than other brokers have delivered to date.
The Realty Alliance President and CEO, Craig Cheatham told AGBeat, “If you see any trend among real estate brokerages in the coming months it should be traced to predictable industry reaction to overall trends in the offerings and business rules of MLSs and outside vendors.”
Each broker in The Realty Alliance – and likely elsewhere – will be analyzing their own returns in 2012 as Abbott did to consider whether their brokerages, consumers and agents are better served or not by syndicating their listings.
Milwaukee brokerage Shorewest pulled their real estate listings from syndication last fall. WAV Group Partner, Victor Lund told AGBeat, “As you can see by the graph – Shorewest is the #1 website in their market, and they do not syndicate – proving that brokers and agents do not need to syndicate to drive traffic and leads on their listings. In fact, this may argue that the opposite is true – if you do not syndicate, you provide consumers with an incentive to visit your broker or agent website to find the cheeze. In this case, the cheeze is listing accuracy, comprehensive listing inventory, and most of all, the service of a real estate professional.”
Media companies respond
In early January, AGBeat reached out to Zillow and Realtor.com who chose not to comment on brokers pulling listings from syndication, but Trulia’s company spokesperson, Ken Shuman said, “The accessibility of open and accurate listing information benefits everyone in the home buying and selling process–consumers, agents and brokers. We know that Trulia has a transaction-ready consumer audience and we are confident that brokers and agents who syndicate their listings to Trulia have a greater opportunity to meet new clients and close more transactions.”
Cheatham’s and Abbott’s comments reveal that it is likely that more brokers will join the movement to pull listings, adding to the string of recent announcements. Several real estate listing companies made comments off of the record that revealed a common sentiment of denial, while one blatantly noted that they do not wish for this to be a news story at all. When pressed, one third party syndicator told AGBeat that they would approach each brokerage relationship independently and had already begun the process of speaking with brokers privately, and if necessary, would take their appeal to their own audience.
Start spreading the news...
This article published on Friday, January 27th, 2012 at 8:36 pm | Contact the editor
Topics: Business News
About this Columnist (Full Profile)
Tara Steele is the News Director at AgentGenius, covering real estate news, technology news and everything in between. If you’d like to reach Tara with a question, comment, press release or hot news tip, she frequently checks her email, simply click the link below.
Email Tara Steele
The Daily Hot Sheet
The AGBeat Daily is jam packed with today's news headlines, fresh and neat in your inbox- start the day ahead of the curve.
Comments (58)
Trackback URL | Comments RSS Feed
Social Shares & Links Back
- itext Realty:
itext Realty Third party real estate listing companies, too big to fail? http://t.co/ELbygdRq
- Brian Floor:
Third party real estate listing companies, too big to fail? http://t.co/vZugMPIt
- Rick Gorod:
Third party real estate listing companies, too big to fail?: Abbot stated, “After three years of carefully exami… http://t.co/5uYzO7en
- Heather Maduk:
http://t.co/KQD96NJ4 Third party real estate listing companies, too big to fail?: The Realty A… http://t.co/SRyaVsE5 #RealEstateTrends
- Property Torrent:
Third party real estate listing companies, too big to fail? – AGBeat http://t.co/z4pxdss6
- Bobbie Vansickle:
Third party real estate listing companies, too big to fail?: Abbot stated, “After three years of carefully exami… http://t.co/QILuJoj4
- Kevin Forrester:
Third party real estate listing companies, too big to fail? http://t.co/zpX4ivB6 via @AGBeat
- JaclynMSmith:
Third party real estate listing companies, too big to fail?: The Realty Alliance President and CEO, Craig Cheath… http://t.co/lmADrn4u
- Eric Duncan:
Third party real estate listing companies, too big to fail? http://t.co/e0OjRyqN via @AGBeat
- cskyle:
Third party real estate listing companies, too big to fail? http://t.co/Ci5jAXse
- ARG Abbott Realty Group Pulls Listings from Real Estate Syndicators - Hammers Zillow, Trulia and REALTOR.com:
[...] Third party real estate listing companies, too big to fail? (agbeat.com) [...]
- Matt Nowak:
Third party #realestate listing companies, too big to fail? – AGBeat http://t.co/PhH1Hyji
- Ed Short:
Third party real estate listing companies, too big to fail? – via @AGBeat | http://t.co/mr3m2uGB
- Russ Bergeron:
Third party real estate listing companies, too big to fail? http://t.co/vCFKqWZS via @AGBeat #inforjb
- HomeVisit:
Third party real estate listing companies, too big to fail? (via @AgentGenius) http://t.co/fSL9Xu9y
- John Horning:
Third party real estate listing companies, too big to fail? http://t.co/Kcvui3eE via @AGBeat
- iPlayerHD:
Third party real estate listing companies, too big to fail? http://t.co/FaypvEFP via @AGBeat
- Gail Holland:
Third party real estate listing companies, too big to fail? http://t.co/2gfsou4u via @AGBeat
- Suzie Perlstein:
Third party real estate listing companies, too big to fail? – via @AGBeat | http://t.co/mr3m2uGB
- Carla Dimond:
Buyers deserve choices on how they view property
Third party real estate listing companies, too big to fail? http://t.co/vENthZ54 via @zite - jeaneeinabottle:
Third party real estate listing companies, too big to fail? http://t.co/sGeiZe3E via @AGBeat
- Real Estate HQ:
RT @mikesparr: Third party real estate listing companies, too big to fail? http://t.co/5VzEtrzB via @AGBeat: RT … http://t.co/YepZHCAL
- Don H. Johnson:
#Realtors, MUST we use 3rd Party Real Estate Listing Companies? http://t.co/EVwKzY04 & http://t.co/VzZjWhDo I'm not sure, how about you?
- Cassie Webb:
Third party real estate listing companies, too big to fail? http://t.co/wReDzxfm via @AGBeat
- Jay Taylor:
This video seems to be shaking a lot of trees around industry. What do you think, good or bad for the industry? http://t.co/UaN19cdH
- Third Party Aggregators becoming Dinosaurs:
[...] Read Full Article from Ag Beat [...]
- iLoan Home Mortgage | Friends Don’t Let Friends Use Zillow, Trulia and Realtor.com to Find Homes for Sale | iLoan Home Mortgage:
[...] Edina Realty decided to pull their listings from these third party aggregators. This is a growing trend nationally on the part of real estate brokerages to ensure that their listings are handled in [...]
- 411 Realty®,Inc.:
#Realtors, MUST we use 3rd Party Real Estate Listing Companies? http://t.co/EVwKzY04 & http://t.co/VzZjWhDo I'm not sure, how about you?
- Mark Bowen:
Third party real estate listing companies, too big to fail? http://t.co/phVlpQ3i via @AGBeat
- Union Twibune:
S.D. real estate firm cuts ties with Trulia, Zillow: http://t.co/3KXi7yy0… http://t.co/Zdtgpymh #twib
- San Diego News:
S.D. real estate firm cuts ties with Trulia, Zillow: http://t.co/s2Rfi90v… http://t.co/wKSz9cFt
- Rotsart Real Estate:
S.D. real estate firm cuts ties with Trulia, Zillow: http://t.co/rxtCYazO… http://t.co/7iGKwTxB
- UT Classifieds:
S.D. real estate firm cuts ties with Trulia, Zillow\n: http://t.co/8XRy23Hu… http://t.co/pp4nScBH #REnews #sdut
- UT Classifieds:
S.D. real estate firm cuts ties with Trulia, Zillow\n: http://t.co/cc6Dj9nY… http://t.co/G80qxWpG #REnews #sdut
- USHUD.com:
Third party real estate listing companies, too big to fail? http://t.co/Re2P5MqO
- Mike King:
San Diego Brokerage Pulls all their listings from Zillow, Trulia and Realtor.com – Could This be a Burgeoning Trend? – http://t.co/bZHEoV9T
- Mortgage Updated:
RT @ushud: Third party real estate listing companies, too big to fail? http://t.co/LOl9s1ib
- Charles M. Dawe:
Third party real estate listing companies, too big to fail? http://t.co/Sens5pu3 via @AGBeat
@CharlesMDawe
http://t.co/U2eveMnO - Open letter to brokers on ending listing syndication - AGBeat:
[...] We reported last week that San Diego-based Abbot Realty Group (ARG) President and Managing Broker, Jim Abbott released a video on YouTube explaining why their brokerage will no longer permit third party syndication sites like Trulia, Realtor.com and Zillow to syndicate their listings, but will continue to syndicate company listings to their local MLS, Sandicor. ARG’s announcement is the latest in a string of similar developments. [...]
- Lauren Cotner:
Touche[ http://t.co/P84sfrJW
- peter lucca:
Pjlucca http://t.co/SFi8xzgd
- Jim Reppond:
Third party real estate listing companies, too big to fail? http://t.co/bH0ZxcoW via @AGBeat
Benn Rosales
Conal Campbell
Elijah May
Lani Rosales
Tara Steele
Marti Trewe
Charlene Jimenez
Good for Jim, I’ve made this argument in the past. Many MLSs have allowed syndication of all their listings. At our MLS in Ventura County hasn’t been implemented syndication because we were trying to negotiate, "opt-in" so brokers could chose to include listings but the two major syndicators only wanted to work with "opt-out". I’m not sure MLSs should be involved in pushing listings to syndication sites at all.
Its the industry’s own fault that the listing syndicators exist in the first place.
NAR could have acted in its member’s best interest by organizing Internet listing distribution in a way that benefits consumers and the agents/brokers who actually go out and do the the work to get and publish listings, but instead they chose to double dip by selling out the Realtor.com name.
Then there are the MLSs. 950+ fiefdoms whose #1 priority is to justify their existence (and their fees) in the digital age by kowtowing to the anti-competitive whims of their own dues paying members.
The idiotic rules and practices that emerge (Can’t show DOM. Can’t show price changes. Can’t "append" a listing with a AVM or user comments. Can’t do this, Can’t do that…) gave the ZIllows and the Trulias all the daylight they needed to do the one thing the "industry" *still* can’t do: Design a user experience that puts what the CONSUMER wants ahead of what "the industry" wants.
THAT is why the syndicators ate the industry’s lunch. You created the monster, and now the monster has enough VC and IPO cash that it doesn’t even have to pretend that they are worried about a couple of brokers growing a set 10 years too late.
Yep. But I hope it’s not too late? We’ll see. Reminds me of how the RELO business was lost.
Spot on…
Great video. Everyone should make the time to watch it. Abbott makes some compelling points.
Interesting move. It will be an interesting future to see whether or not buyers skip over properties they do not see on these sites or go in search of ALL properties on the market whether by themselves or through the services of buyer broker representation.
Thanks for sharing. Agreed that many portals may be too big to fail but the question Matt W. asked is spot on: will buyers be aware of missing listings and skip over, or do they just "surf" these sites for ideas and then reach out to their REALTOR when really serious to search the MLS.
Do we have the names of the major players who left the game?
I have asked buyers what site they are using to search homes and the answer is always the same: several different ones. Wish the majority of replies was "your website" but the truth is the consumers want to search a variety of sites.
Getting ready to launch a new website so I have been getting as much feedback and input from clients as possible. One thing I have noticed is they know they CANNOT trust some of the websites mentioned yet they continue to use them…..
We are a site that displays syndicated listings but we do it different. We do not allow any advertising from other real estate agents on the listing detail page and we provide SEO backlinks to the brokers site. We respect the data and aim to help Realtors grow their business with relevant key real estate indicators
Stuffed full of IPO cash, the syndicators can pay the brokers ‘privately’ in their private discussions.
all three are very well financially positioned, but not all three are public…
People that think they can make quality real estate decisions using Trulia and Zillow are mistaken. The data is useful but limited. I give them a lot of credit for what they have done. At least these companies give the leads back to the listing agent – Reator.com requires you to pay for an upgrade package or else…. They give the leads to someone in your market that does pay for the upgrade. Not cool at all.
From a consumer’s perpective, the more places their property is seen, the better – Consumers should demand open data sharing of their listings.
I hope these brokers aren’t making decisions based on hitwise data and use sources like comscore to back up their positioning. It’s so rare that anyone quotes hitwise as a source.
Everyone should read counter points by Jay Thompson – Phoenix Real Estate Guy. He made very compelling counter arguments.
1. Third party sites have stolen nothing, the listings are freely given to them
2. MLS data is also inaccurate and out of date…the issue is with data entry, not display
3. IDX websites are even worse offenders when it comes to both a) having another agent get leads of "your" listings and b) confusion over who the listing agent is. Most clients I know think Im the listing agent for all the properties I send the, from my IDX website
4. We’re adults. No one’s holding a gun to your head to buy anything. Agents make the same choice when deciding to market their home in the local newspaper…there’s no long contract there, just an incredibly high one-time fee
5. Syndication sites show the data their given – if it’s inflated it’s because an agent didn’t take it off. Why would you expect someone to take down your free marketing if you didn’t tell them it was no longer available?
6. A scammer can use the MLS site just as easily to defraud someone…it’s just very few people visit those MLS sites
7. At the end of the day, the Home seller chooses what happens with their listing data…they don’t have to hire a broker who doesn’t syndicate
Thank You Jim Abbott for taking the effort to expose a problem that has been on my mind for sometime. Not knowing the full extent of how third party information prospers I had been concerned about the reasoning why it was given out.
Incorrect information, too much information and how it is used disturbs me and should also disturb home sellers as well if they knew the extent of what it means to them.
My first concern was the address. Too many times i have noticed prospective buyers or people knocking on doors as i was there to show the property to legitimate buyers. When no one answers the door these people walk around to the back and are checking things out. Whatever that means.
We all want greater exposure for our listings but if it doesn’t work well forgetaboutit. We tried it and it does not work. Tweek it or better yet eliminate it. Real Estate is a local business in most cases and local people know how to get the information when they want it. Getting to the correct information fast and local is a benefit to all concerned.
Local Boards and Local MLS, NJAR in my state, NAR officials have failed to see the problem or do anything to protect the public or Realtors. Initially, it may have sounded like a good idea but, they have failed to monitor.
The IDX may also need monitoring. What do they do with this private, personal information. Are they satisfied with the fee’s they charge us or are they selling the info.