<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Google Gets It</title> <atom:link href="http://agbeat.com/editorials/real-estate/google-gets-it/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://agbeat.com/editorials/real-estate/google-gets-it/</link> <description>News, insights, tools, and inspiration for business owners and professionals</description> <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 19:01:13 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator> <xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" /> <item><title>By: Matthew Rathbun</title><link>http://agbeat.com/editorials/real-estate/google-gets-it/#comment-7407</link> <dc:creator>Matthew Rathbun</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 03:09:31 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://agentgenius.com/?p=1586#comment-7407</guid> <description>Well....at least they can&#039;t sue McDonalds for spilling coffee on themselves.  Oh wait!!!  Vicky, I love your quick musings.  I also thought it was silly at first, but I guess if you don&#039;t have permission, than you probably don&#039;t have purpose and you should stick to what really is needed to sell a home.   People are just looking to separate a Realtor and their money...</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well&#8230;.at least they can&#8217;t sue McDonalds for spilling coffee on themselves.  Oh wait!!!  Vicky, I love your quick musings.  I also thought it was silly at first, but I guess if you don&#8217;t have permission, than you probably don&#8217;t have purpose and you should stick to what really is needed to sell a home.   People are just looking to separate a Realtor and their money&#8230;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Vicki Moore</title><link>http://agbeat.com/editorials/real-estate/google-gets-it/#comment-7325</link> <dc:creator>Vicki Moore</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2008 18:52:44 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://agentgenius.com/?p=1586#comment-7325</guid> <description>I certainly understand your position. It&#039;s another point for Big Brother. Someone is always going to find a way to harm, if that&#039;s what they&#039;re looking for.
I would argue whether or not it&#039;s enhancing the ability to case a home or find a weakness at a school.  As we know from looking at virtual tours, the actual site doesn&#039;t quite match up to the real thing.  Maybe it&#039;s just the belief that that is too vile for me to consider. If someone is actually doing as you suggest, the only thing I can say is God help us.
I imagine Google is walking a fine line; but I doubt that they arbitrarily offered this feature on their site without checking with legal counsel first.
The places we can go out into public without being filmed are diminishing.  Like I said, I thought a lawsuit of this type would surface much sooner.  As realtors, we need to be aware of this lawsuit and consider whether or not we&#039;re subjecting ourselves to the possibility of a lawsuit.  We&#039;re just as at risk as Google is.
In this particular case, they&#039;re claiming invasion of privacy; however, apparently there are photos of the property on another website. That may weaken the strength of their claim.
I took &quot;just a picture&quot; to a place of humor, which is always where my mind goes. I&#039;m sure that it&#039;s a very serious matter for them as well.  I have enough seriousness to deal with. I want to laugh. I wanted to see some half dressed guy jumping out a window.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I certainly understand your position. It&#8217;s another point for Big Brother. Someone is always going to find a way to harm, if that&#8217;s what they&#8217;re looking for.</p><p>I would argue whether or not it&#8217;s enhancing the ability to case a home or find a weakness at a school.  As we know from looking at virtual tours, the actual site doesn&#8217;t quite match up to the real thing.  Maybe it&#8217;s just the belief that that is too vile for me to consider. If someone is actually doing as you suggest, the only thing I can say is God help us.</p><p>I imagine Google is walking a fine line; but I doubt that they arbitrarily offered this feature on their site without checking with legal counsel first.</p><p>The places we can go out into public without being filmed are diminishing.  Like I said, I thought a lawsuit of this type would surface much sooner.  As realtors, we need to be aware of this lawsuit and consider whether or not we&#8217;re subjecting ourselves to the possibility of a lawsuit.  We&#8217;re just as at risk as Google is.</p><p>In this particular case, they&#8217;re claiming invasion of privacy; however, apparently there are photos of the property on another website. That may weaken the strength of their claim.</p><p>I took &#8220;just a picture&#8221; to a place of humor, which is always where my mind goes. I&#8217;m sure that it&#8217;s a very serious matter for them as well.  I have enough seriousness to deal with. I want to laugh. I wanted to see some half dressed guy jumping out a window.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Benn Rosales</title><link>http://agbeat.com/editorials/real-estate/google-gets-it/#comment-7306</link> <dc:creator>Benn Rosales</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2008 03:09:50 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://agentgenius.com/?p=1586#comment-7306</guid> <description>Although its a cool idea, I don&#039;t personally like it- I think its invasive and will cause people trouble.  I spent about an hour reading plates the other day, although the resolution was so weak they were hard to make out, I&#039;m guessing someone somewhere that wants to do harm will find a way.
However, I can see working it into my home marketing as the ultimate exterior virtual tour- so long as the neighborhood is in as good a condition as my listing, my sellers won&#039;t pay a steep price for their neigbors lack of good care.
You said just a picture, but I assure you that it is more than just a picture.  You can virtually drive down the street by clicking on the arrows, turn around and see the other side of the window.  Those casing homes for a robbery no longer need to risk being seen casing the joint- they can just log online- easy.
Even more scary was the ability to see schools and find weaknesses in play areas, places a predator can hide or stalk victims.  All can now be done safely in the privacy of their own homes without risk of detection.  I wont even get into terrorism, or other ways this could be used for evil purposes.
It is a cool tool, but not really worth the risk.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Although its a cool idea, I don&#8217;t personally like it- I think its invasive and will cause people trouble.  I spent about an hour reading plates the other day, although the resolution was so weak they were hard to make out, I&#8217;m guessing someone somewhere that wants to do harm will find a way.</p><p>However, I can see working it into my home marketing as the ultimate exterior virtual tour- so long as the neighborhood is in as good a condition as my listing, my sellers won&#8217;t pay a steep price for their neigbors lack of good care.</p><p>You said just a picture, but I assure you that it is more than just a picture.  You can virtually drive down the street by clicking on the arrows, turn around and see the other side of the window.  Those casing homes for a robbery no longer need to risk being seen casing the joint- they can just log online- easy.</p><p>Even more scary was the ability to see schools and find weaknesses in play areas, places a predator can hide or stalk victims.  All can now be done safely in the privacy of their own homes without risk of detection.  I wont even get into terrorism, or other ways this could be used for evil purposes.</p><p>It is a cool tool, but not really worth the risk.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
