<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Breaking Down NAR Dues- the NAR&#8217;s Value Proposition</title> <atom:link href="http://agbeat.com/editorials/real-estate/breaking-down-nar-dues-the-nars-value-proposition/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://agbeat.com/editorials/real-estate/breaking-down-nar-dues-the-nars-value-proposition/</link> <description>News, insights, tools, and inspiration for business owners and professionals</description> <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 04:53:16 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator> <xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" /> <item><title>By: Realtor Magazine Reducing Print Publication in Half &#124; Real Estate Opinion MAG - AgentGenius</title><link>http://agbeat.com/editorials/real-estate/breaking-down-nar-dues-the-nars-value-proposition/#comment-34811</link> <dc:creator>Realtor Magazine Reducing Print Publication in Half &#124; Real Estate Opinion MAG - AgentGenius</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 01:18:06 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://agentgenius.com/?p=13066#comment-34811</guid> <description>[...] It was recently released that based on 1,200,000 members at $6.00 per member each year, publications (Realtor Magazine) brings in .... [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] It was recently released that based on 1,200,000 members at $6.00 per member each year, publications (Realtor Magazine) brings in &#8230;. [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Kevin Tomlinson</title><link>http://agbeat.com/editorials/real-estate/breaking-down-nar-dues-the-nars-value-proposition/#comment-33836</link> <dc:creator>Kevin Tomlinson</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 22:09:07 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://agentgenius.com/?p=13066#comment-33836</guid> <description>Rock it out Bob!
Wow...if I could form a sentence, or two, I would have said exactly what you did.
Remember, now&#039;s a great time to buy real estate....hey I remember saying that exact thing in 2004-05.
Hey, I guess it&#039;s ALWAYS a great time to buy real estate, no?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rock it out Bob!<br
/> Wow&#8230;if I could form a sentence, or two, I would have said exactly what you did.</p><p>Remember, now&#8217;s a great time to buy real estate&#8230;.hey I remember saying that exact thing in 2004-05.</p><p>Hey, I guess it&#8217;s ALWAYS a great time to buy real estate, no?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Bob Wilson</title><link>http://agbeat.com/editorials/real-estate/breaking-down-nar-dues-the-nars-value-proposition/#comment-33827</link> <dc:creator>Bob Wilson</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 21:14:31 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://agentgenius.com/?p=13066#comment-33827</guid> <description>@all-NAR-apologists:
Please explain to me how so little is done with so much.
Please start with why there is NO health care options worth mentioning.
Of course we did get the short sale white paper, which has solved &lt;strike&gt;all&lt;/strike&gt;  &lt;strike&gt;most&lt;/strike&gt; &lt;strike&gt;a few&lt;/strike&gt; next to none of the short sale issues.
I won&#039;t complain about the $80, but I would like to see better use of these funds.
$7.2 million for economic and tech research? In light off how freakin dead wrong their economists have been, I have to assume they just paid some dip minimum wage to tell the world on a daily basis that &quot;It&#039;s a great time to buy real estate&quot;.  Given what was a wasted investment there, and they have no tech to speak about, please tell me they didnt spend the rest of it to get Carpenter a new laptop and wireless card so he can tweet on the road.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@all-NAR-apologists:</p><p>Please explain to me how so little is done with so much.</p><p>Please start with why there is NO health care options worth mentioning.</p><p>Of course we did get the short sale white paper, which has solved <strike>all</strike> <strike>most</strike> <strike>a few</strike> next to none of the short sale issues.</p><p>I won&#8217;t complain about the $80, but I would like to see better use of these funds.</p><p>$7.2 million for economic and tech research? In light off how freakin dead wrong their economists have been, I have to assume they just paid some dip minimum wage to tell the world on a daily basis that &#8220;It&#8217;s a great time to buy real estate&#8221;.  Given what was a wasted investment there, and they have no tech to speak about, please tell me they didnt spend the rest of it to get Carpenter a new laptop and wireless card so he can tweet on the road.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jim Rake</title><link>http://agbeat.com/editorials/real-estate/breaking-down-nar-dues-the-nars-value-proposition/#comment-33791</link> <dc:creator>Jim Rake</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 11:24:59 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://agentgenius.com/?p=13066#comment-33791</guid> <description>Lani - always appreciate the info.  NAR does some good work, no doubt.  Our profession is evolving, albeit not as quickly as we&#039;d like.  We just have have to keep pushing, change is never easy.
And, yes, Realtor.com is dying a slow death despite NAR&#039;s efforts.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lani &#8211; always appreciate the info.  NAR does some good work, no doubt.  Our profession is evolving, albeit not as quickly as we&#8217;d like.  We just have have to keep pushing, change is never easy.<br
/> And, yes, Realtor.com is dying a slow death despite NAR&#8217;s efforts.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Missy Caulk</title><link>http://agbeat.com/editorials/real-estate/breaking-down-nar-dues-the-nars-value-proposition/#comment-33784</link> <dc:creator>Missy Caulk</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 03:23:15 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://agentgenius.com/?p=13066#comment-33784</guid> <description>80.00 is nothing.
I would pay more to not have them discriminate against those who don&#039;t pay on realtor.com.
Trulia and Zillow offer much more. If there was not a need they would not be growing as much. I remember a few years ago no seller had heard of them, not so now.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>80.00 is nothing.</p><p>I would pay more to not have them discriminate against those who don&#8217;t pay on realtor.com.</p><p>Trulia and Zillow offer much more. If there was not a need they would not be growing as much. I remember a few years ago no seller had heard of them, not so now.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Matt Stigliano</title><link>http://agbeat.com/editorials/real-estate/breaking-down-nar-dues-the-nars-value-proposition/#comment-33722</link> <dc:creator>Matt Stigliano</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 00:59:22 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://agentgenius.com/?p=13066#comment-33722</guid> <description>My new favorite way to say &quot;lobbying&quot; - Legislative/Regulatory Advocacy.
I also had to chuckle at the fact that $0 goes to &quot;Volunteer Leadership&quot;.
Thanks for showing me the value in that one.  I thought those volunteers were rolling in the dough.
Alright, so I&#039;m being a bit sarcastic, but they truly are amazing numbers.  Do they give us the numbers on what&#039;s being made outside our dues anywhere?  I remember during the whole float debacle, they said that was paid for with non-dues money as well.  How much is flowing in there?  Would love to know.  Do they get any of the cut for Realtor.com or is it just a flat fee?  I hope they&#039;re a least getting a percentage of the &lt;del&gt;extortion&lt;/del&gt;, I mean, fees to upgrade listings.
It is pretty amazing that some of the outside sites like Trulia and Zillow actually offer you more bang for your zero bucks.  I haven&#039;t even visited Realtor.com in quite some time.  I wish Trulia and Zillow could have data as accurate as Realtor.com, but to be honest, I&#039;d rather use them.
I just need to figure out how to run my own national association - there&#039;s gold in &#039;dem &#039;dar hills.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My new favorite way to say &#8220;lobbying&#8221; &#8211; Legislative/Regulatory Advocacy.</p><p>I also had to chuckle at the fact that $0 goes to &#8220;Volunteer Leadership&#8221;.</p><p>Thanks for showing me the value in that one.  I thought those volunteers were rolling in the dough.</p><p>Alright, so I&#8217;m being a bit sarcastic, but they truly are amazing numbers.  Do they give us the numbers on what&#8217;s being made outside our dues anywhere?  I remember during the whole float debacle, they said that was paid for with non-dues money as well.  How much is flowing in there?  Would love to know.  Do they get any of the cut for Realtor.com or is it just a flat fee?  I hope they&#8217;re a least getting a percentage of the <del>extortion</del>, I mean, fees to upgrade listings.</p><p>It is pretty amazing that some of the outside sites like Trulia and Zillow actually offer you more bang for your zero bucks.  I haven&#8217;t even visited Realtor.com in quite some time.  I wish Trulia and Zillow could have data as accurate as Realtor.com, but to be honest, I&#8217;d rather use them.</p><p>I just need to figure out how to run my own national association &#8211; there&#8217;s gold in &#8216;dem &#8216;dar hills.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Wesner  Michel</title><link>http://agbeat.com/editorials/real-estate/breaking-down-nar-dues-the-nars-value-proposition/#comment-59299</link> <dc:creator>Wesner  Michel</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2009 22:38:34 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://agentgenius.com/?p=13066#comment-59299</guid> <description>&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_comment&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_twitter_username&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_content&quot;&gt;Breaking Down NAR Dues- the NAR&#039;s Value Proposition &#124; Real Estate ...: NAR&#039;s Value Proposition The Natio.. http://tinyurl.com/m7xmlc&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span
class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span
class="topsy_twitter_username"><span
class="topsy_trackback_content">Breaking Down NAR Dues- the NAR&#8217;s Value Proposition | Real Estate &#8230;: NAR&#8217;s Value Proposition The Natio.. http://tinyurl.com/m7xmlc</span></span></span></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Paula Henry</title><link>http://agbeat.com/editorials/real-estate/breaking-down-nar-dues-the-nars-value-proposition/#comment-33709</link> <dc:creator>Paula Henry</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2009 22:18:29 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://agentgenius.com/?p=13066#comment-33709</guid> <description>That is a lot of money - not individually, but seriously - I&#039;ll second Brad&#039;s nomination to own an ad free R.com.
I wonder - does the NAR make money from the ads on R.com?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is a lot of money &#8211; not individually, but seriously &#8211; I&#8217;ll second Brad&#8217;s nomination to own an ad free R.com.</p><p>I wonder &#8211; does the NAR make money from the ads on R.com?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: South City Lights</title><link>http://agbeat.com/editorials/real-estate/breaking-down-nar-dues-the-nars-value-proposition/#comment-59300</link> <dc:creator>South City Lights</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2009 21:32:24 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://agentgenius.com/?p=13066#comment-59300</guid> <description>&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_comment&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_twitter_username&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_content&quot;&gt;Breaking Down NAR Dues- the NAR&#039;s Value Proposition &#124; Real Estate ... http://tinyurl.com/m7xmlc&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span
class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span
class="topsy_twitter_username"><span
class="topsy_trackback_content">Breaking Down NAR Dues- the NAR&#8217;s Value Proposition | Real Estate &#8230; http://tinyurl.com/m7xmlc</span></span></span></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Keep Austin Weird</title><link>http://agbeat.com/editorials/real-estate/breaking-down-nar-dues-the-nars-value-proposition/#comment-59301</link> <dc:creator>Keep Austin Weird</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2009 19:30:14 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://agentgenius.com/?p=13066#comment-59301</guid> <description>&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_comment&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_twitter_username&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_content&quot;&gt;Breaking Down NAR Dues- the NAR&#039;s Value Proposition &#124; Real Estate ...: No wonder no one wants to join the ug.. http://bit.ly/Ykp99&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span
class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span
class="topsy_twitter_username"><span
class="topsy_trackback_content">Breaking Down NAR Dues- the NAR&#8217;s Value Proposition | Real Estate &#8230;: No wonder no one wants to join the ug.. http://bit.ly/Ykp99</span></span></span></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Danilo Bogdanovic</title><link>http://agbeat.com/editorials/real-estate/breaking-down-nar-dues-the-nars-value-proposition/#comment-33699</link> <dc:creator>Danilo Bogdanovic</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2009 17:53:22 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://agentgenius.com/?p=13066#comment-33699</guid> <description>They don&#039;t charge much on dues compared to others because they have make (much more) money elsewhere.
What about ripping off members by using members&#039; listings/data to create money by charging those same members for leads generated from their own listings/data?
What about pushing the Sentrilock lock box system via local associations that are in cahoots with them despite Sentrilock being more expensive to members while being inferior to the current lock box system in place (which lowers the level of service and safety that Realtors can provide consumers).
And the list goes on...
As Russell said, &quot;They need to stop doing destructive things towards Realtors.&quot;</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They don&#8217;t charge much on dues compared to others because they have make (much more) money elsewhere.</p><p>What about ripping off members by using members&#8217; listings/data to create money by charging those same members for leads generated from their own listings/data?</p><p>What about pushing the Sentrilock lock box system via local associations that are in cahoots with them despite Sentrilock being more expensive to members while being inferior to the current lock box system in place (which lowers the level of service and safety that Realtors can provide consumers).</p><p>And the list goes on&#8230;</p><p>As Russell said, &#8220;They need to stop doing destructive things towards Realtors.&#8221;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Ken Brand</title><link>http://agbeat.com/editorials/real-estate/breaking-down-nar-dues-the-nars-value-proposition/#comment-33688</link> <dc:creator>Ken Brand</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2009 15:22:28 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://agentgenius.com/?p=13066#comment-33688</guid> <description>Wow.  Serious money.  I agree, what we get for the dues is a fair exchange on an individual basis.  What&#039;s missing is the &quot;collective&quot; value of our pooled dues - which is the point of a Trade Association.
To me, the real opportunity is about what &quot;could&quot; be done with just shy of ONE HUNDRED MILLION DOLLARS PER YEAR?
For starters IMHO - WTH - $18,000,000 for Consumer and Member RELATIONSHIP building? I don&#039;t have a relationship with NAR.  Neither do most of the agent I know or work with.
$7,200,000 for Economic and Technological Research - Odd?  Less than 10% of the budget invested in the FUTURE and our race to out think, out deliver, out innovate and out kick-ass against future and current competitors. Come on, less than 10% invested in the future?
I don&#039;t know how you spend $346,000 a week (18million) on Consumer and Member Relationships...how much is that a day.  Somebody is enjoying some sweet relationship building.  (Lori it they aren&#039;t buying you cocktails and other stuff, you&#039;re getting screwed.)
It also sounds weird to spend $4,800,000 or $92,000 per week or almost $10,000 per day, seven days a week, on Code of Ethic/Legal Policy Enforcement and also spend the same pile of dough on something that seems eminently more important - Customer Service and Produce Suite.  (I wonder who&#039;s the customer, &quot;us&quot; or the &quot;public&quot;?)  I&#039;m not saying rules don&#039;t have to enforced but I know if I spend the same amount on legal as I do customer service, I lose in the long run.
That&#039;s my take.  I&#039;m impressed with the total collection, I&#039;m underwhelmed by what our dues actually provides.   I could be wrong, but with this amount of money at stake, it&#039;s no wonder that people in power want to protect their turf, lock things down and meet in private.
NAR spends $1,846,000 per week.  Wow!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow.  Serious money.  I agree, what we get for the dues is a fair exchange on an individual basis.  What&#8217;s missing is the &#8220;collective&#8221; value of our pooled dues &#8211; which is the point of a Trade Association.</p><p> To me, the real opportunity is about what &#8220;could&#8221; be done with just shy of ONE HUNDRED MILLION DOLLARS PER YEAR?</p><p>For starters IMHO &#8211; WTH &#8211; $18,000,000 for Consumer and Member RELATIONSHIP building? I don&#8217;t have a relationship with NAR.  Neither do most of the agent I know or work with.</p><p>$7,200,000 for Economic and Technological Research &#8211; Odd?  Less than 10% of the budget invested in the FUTURE and our race to out think, out deliver, out innovate and out kick-ass against future and current competitors. Come on, less than 10% invested in the future?</p><p>I don&#8217;t know how you spend $346,000 a week (18million) on Consumer and Member Relationships&#8230;how much is that a day.  Somebody is enjoying some sweet relationship building.  (Lori it they aren&#8217;t buying you cocktails and other stuff, you&#8217;re getting screwed.)</p><p>It also sounds weird to spend $4,800,000 or $92,000 per week or almost $10,000 per day, seven days a week, on Code of Ethic/Legal Policy Enforcement and also spend the same pile of dough on something that seems eminently more important &#8211; Customer Service and Produce Suite.  (I wonder who&#8217;s the customer, &#8220;us&#8221; or the &#8220;public&#8221;?)  I&#8217;m not saying rules don&#8217;t have to enforced but I know if I spend the same amount on legal as I do customer service, I lose in the long run.</p><p>That&#8217;s my take.  I&#8217;m impressed with the total collection, I&#8217;m underwhelmed by what our dues actually provides.   I could be wrong, but with this amount of money at stake, it&#8217;s no wonder that people in power want to protect their turf, lock things down and meet in private.</p><p>NAR spends $1,846,000 per week.  Wow!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Joe Spake</title><link>http://agbeat.com/editorials/real-estate/breaking-down-nar-dues-the-nars-value-proposition/#comment-33681</link> <dc:creator>Joe Spake</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2009 12:23:43 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://agentgenius.com/?p=13066#comment-33681</guid> <description>Very interesting views on NAR&#039;s expenditures.  I am wondering wondering about the $96M for Code of Ethics/Legal Policy, Enforcement.  I don&#039;t see any enforcement (or policing) done by NAR on the COE.  Maybe this only applies to my local situation, but COE violations, no matter how egregious are only addressed when a member files a complaint through the Grievance process.  How is that $96M used?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very interesting views on NAR&#8217;s expenditures.  I am wondering wondering about the $96M for Code of Ethics/Legal Policy, Enforcement.  I don&#8217;t see any enforcement (or policing) done by NAR on the COE.  Maybe this only applies to my local situation, but COE violations, no matter how egregious are only addressed when a member files a complaint through the Grievance process.  How is that $96M used?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Karen Rice</title><link>http://agbeat.com/editorials/real-estate/breaking-down-nar-dues-the-nars-value-proposition/#comment-33679</link> <dc:creator>Karen Rice</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2009 11:03:03 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://agentgenius.com/?p=13066#comment-33679</guid> <description>QUOTE:  Realtors who don’t directly pay MOVE get a “free listing” on the site - just like they do with Trulia, Zillow and now dozens of other sites.
BZZZT.  WRONG!  You get MORE for free on Trulia, Zillow, and other sites.  You can put as many pictures as you want, often add virtual tours, links to your own site, etc.  Trulia and Zillow FREE run circles around what you have to PAY big bucks for to get on REALTOR.COM.  The REALTOR.COM &quot;free&quot; listing is a JOKE, even though they now let you have 4 pictures! Holy hannah, 4????  Gosh, I&#039;m so overwhelmed by the generosity.
I do agree that the stuff on Realtor.org is certainly a bargain.  I would pay more per year for NAR dues ($120 or so) if it meant I could have those fancy &quot;ENHANCED&quot; listings at no additional crazy monthly fee!
Yes, the NAR dues aren&#039;t that expensive - but don&#039;t go trying to put REALTOR.COM in there as something valuable.  It&#039;s nothing - NOTHING - for NAR to be proud of.  Why do you think Trulia and Zillow have so quickly put the heat onto REALTOR.COM?  How long do you think REALTOR.COM is going to REMAIN #1?
I&#039;ve had enhanced listings through my broker for two years.  In all that time, I have had three or four inquiries directly from R.com; one did lead to a double ended sale but that was last year.  Someone else called THE OFFICE after seeing my listing on R.com and the floor time agent sold the house to them.  SO in two years time, I have had two sales as a result of R.com.
And many more as a result of my own blog/website.  Let&#039;s be serious.  R.com as it is now is nothing to be proud of....they should be ashamed for gouging the very people that power it.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>QUOTE:  Realtors who don’t directly pay MOVE get a “free listing” on the site &#8211; just like they do with Trulia, Zillow and now dozens of other sites.</p><p>BZZZT.  WRONG!  You get MORE for free on Trulia, Zillow, and other sites.  You can put as many pictures as you want, often add virtual tours, links to your own site, etc.  Trulia and Zillow FREE run circles around what you have to PAY big bucks for to get on REALTOR.COM.  The REALTOR.COM &#8220;free&#8221; listing is a JOKE, even though they now let you have 4 pictures! Holy hannah, 4????  Gosh, I&#8217;m so overwhelmed by the generosity.</p><p>I do agree that the stuff on Realtor.org is certainly a bargain.  I would pay more per year for NAR dues ($120 or so) if it meant I could have those fancy &#8220;ENHANCED&#8221; listings at no additional crazy monthly fee!</p><p>Yes, the NAR dues aren&#8217;t that expensive &#8211; but don&#8217;t go trying to put REALTOR.COM in there as something valuable.  It&#8217;s nothing &#8211; NOTHING &#8211; for NAR to be proud of.  Why do you think Trulia and Zillow have so quickly put the heat onto REALTOR.COM?  How long do you think REALTOR.COM is going to REMAIN #1?</p><p>I&#8217;ve had enhanced listings through my broker for two years.  In all that time, I have had three or four inquiries directly from R.com; one did lead to a double ended sale but that was last year.  Someone else called THE OFFICE after seeing my listing on R.com and the floor time agent sold the house to them.  SO in two years time, I have had two sales as a result of R.com.</p><p>And many more as a result of my own blog/website.  Let&#8217;s be serious.  R.com as it is now is nothing to be proud of&#8230;.they should be ashamed for gouging the very people that power it.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: John Kalinowski</title><link>http://agbeat.com/editorials/real-estate/breaking-down-nar-dues-the-nars-value-proposition/#comment-33678</link> <dc:creator>John Kalinowski</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2009 10:33:53 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://agentgenius.com/?p=13066#comment-33678</guid> <description>@Fred Romano - I used to pay big bucks for the enhanced listings on Realtor.com, but stopped cold turkey early last year when they asked for a pot of gold to continue. I haven&#039;t had a single client or potential listing ask for it yet, nor have I lost a listing because of it (that I know of). We now spend the money in other areas, and have seen much better results.
Agents should stop paying for Realtor.com&#039;s ridiculously overpriced &quot;enhancements&quot;. That might be the final straw that would force them into providing something that&#039;s actually useful to agents, and ends the extortion of making us pay to get our own data back. Data that we already paid to provide to the MLS!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Fred Romano &#8211; I used to pay big bucks for the enhanced listings on Realtor.com, but stopped cold turkey early last year when they asked for a pot of gold to continue. I haven&#8217;t had a single client or potential listing ask for it yet, nor have I lost a listing because of it (that I know of). We now spend the money in other areas, and have seen much better results.</p><p>Agents should stop paying for Realtor.com&#8217;s ridiculously overpriced &#8220;enhancements&#8221;. That might be the final straw that would force them into providing something that&#8217;s actually useful to agents, and ends the extortion of making us pay to get our own data back. Data that we already paid to provide to the MLS!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Thomas Johnson</title><link>http://agbeat.com/editorials/real-estate/breaking-down-nar-dues-the-nars-value-proposition/#comment-33674</link> <dc:creator>Thomas Johnson</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2009 05:47:40 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://agentgenius.com/?p=13066#comment-33674</guid> <description>If our association could use its clout to get us group rates on health insurance, that could add about $5000-$10,000 to every agent&#039;s bottom line.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If our association could use its clout to get us group rates on health insurance, that could add about $5000-$10,000 to every agent&#8217;s bottom line.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Thomas Johnson</title><link>http://agbeat.com/editorials/real-estate/breaking-down-nar-dues-the-nars-value-proposition/#comment-33673</link> <dc:creator>Thomas Johnson</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2009 05:45:15 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://agentgenius.com/?p=13066#comment-33673</guid> <description>I didn&#039;t see an allocation for the palaces in DC and Chicago.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I didn&#8217;t see an allocation for the palaces in DC and Chicago.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Brad Nix</title><link>http://agbeat.com/editorials/real-estate/breaking-down-nar-dues-the-nars-value-proposition/#comment-33671</link> <dc:creator>Brad Nix</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2009 03:33:24 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://agentgenius.com/?p=13066#comment-33671</guid> <description>I&#039;d pay more to own and operate an ad free R.com</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d pay more to own and operate an ad free R.com</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Kevin Tomlinson</title><link>http://agbeat.com/editorials/real-estate/breaking-down-nar-dues-the-nars-value-proposition/#comment-33670</link> <dc:creator>Kevin Tomlinson</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2009 01:04:15 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://agentgenius.com/?p=13066#comment-33670</guid> <description>one last thing....everything on the realtor.org site is provided to me through my broker (obviously I pay for it through my split).</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>one last thing&#8230;.everything on the realtor.org site is provided to me through my broker (obviously I pay for it through my split).</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Kevin Tomlinson</title><link>http://agbeat.com/editorials/real-estate/breaking-down-nar-dues-the-nars-value-proposition/#comment-33669</link> <dc:creator>Kevin Tomlinson</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2009 00:58:16 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://agentgenius.com/?p=13066#comment-33669</guid> <description>Bargain or not--NAR&#039;s &quot;mission&quot; is not to get us a free publication.  So the notion that it&#039;s cheap &quot;so don&#039;t worry about it,&quot; doesn&#039;t cut it for me.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bargain or not&#8211;NAR&#8217;s &#8220;mission&#8221; is not to get us a free publication.  So the notion that it&#8217;s cheap &#8220;so don&#8217;t worry about it,&#8221; doesn&#8217;t cut it for me.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
