Comments on: CharityUSA Gets It! http://agbeat.com/editorials/charityusa-gets-it/ News, insights, tools, and inspiration for business owners and professionals Wed, 16 May 2012 17:25:59 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2 By: Juicer_Reviewshttp://agbeat.com/editorials/charityusa-gets-it/#comment-62040 Juicer_Reviews Fri, 28 May 2010 12:46:39 +0000 http://agentgenius.com/?p=371#comment-62040 <span class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span class="topsy_twitter_username"><span class="topsy_trackback_content">CharityUSA Gets It!: http://bit.ly/9xA6PQ via @addthis</span></span> CharityUSA Gets It!: http://bit.ly/9xA6PQ via @addthis

]]> By: Heatherhttp://agbeat.com/editorials/charityusa-gets-it/#comment-25014 Heather Fri, 12 Dec 2008 00:06:38 +0000 http://agentgenius.com/?p=371#comment-25014 For 2008 CharityUSA.com posted: Contributions $17,257,240 Amount to Charity Clients $2,915,435 That's a $14 million operating budget. Best to give directly to charities and search out other fair trade ennvironmentally friendly charitable merchandising sites like global exchange. For 2008 CharityUSA.com posted:
Contributions $17,257,240
Amount to Charity Clients $2,915,435

That’s a $14 million operating budget.

Best to give directly to charities and search out other fair trade ennvironmentally friendly charitable merchandising sites like global exchange.

]]> By: Anonymoushttp://agbeat.com/editorials/charityusa-gets-it/#comment-9654 Anonymous Fri, 23 May 2008 00:50:17 +0000 http://agentgenius.com/?p=371#comment-9654 Just FYI, I work for Charity USA, and we didn't actually create that SPAM. Our tech department wouldn't have the time. I'm glad it's getting positive feedback, there are a lot of good people that work really hard to keep it a respectable and honest charity and retail company. Just FYI, I work for Charity USA, and we didn’t actually create that SPAM. Our tech department wouldn’t have the time. I’m glad it’s getting positive feedback, there are a lot of good people that work really hard to keep it a respectable and honest charity and retail company.

]]> By: Alhttp://agbeat.com/editorials/charityusa-gets-it/#comment-7115 Al Thu, 03 Apr 2008 13:09:21 +0000 http://agentgenius.com/?p=371#comment-7115 The comment by Jim gives the impression that only 16 % of the money collected by CharityUSA via the clicks on the websites they operate is actually passed on to charity. But that's not the case: Lisa Halstead explicitly says that "CharityUSA passes 100% of sponsor advertising on to charity", and this claim is confirmed on the website mentioned by Jim, that of the Washington Secretary of State (http://www.secstate.wa.gov/charities/search_detail_cfr.aspx?cfr_id=20823). So even if CharityUSA dooes make money out of the products they sale and even though I don't approve of their use of spamming, if simply clicking on a button helps to raise money for the hungry or the sick, certainly it's worth doing it? Why not just send them an email to complain about their advertising policy? The comment by Jim gives the impression that only 16 % of the money collected by CharityUSA via the clicks on the websites they operate is actually passed on to charity. But that’s not the case: Lisa Halstead explicitly says that “CharityUSA passes 100% of sponsor advertising on to charity”, and this claim is confirmed on the website mentioned by Jim, that of the Washington Secretary of State (http://www.secstate.wa.gov/charities/search_detail_cfr.aspx?cfr_id=20823). So even if CharityUSA dooes make money out of the products they sale and even though I don’t approve of their use of spamming, if simply clicking on a button helps to raise money for the hungry or the sick, certainly it’s worth doing it? Why not just send them an email to complain about their advertising policy?

]]> By: Jimhttp://agbeat.com/editorials/charityusa-gets-it/#comment-3391 Jim Tue, 29 Jan 2008 18:29:35 +0000 http://agentgenius.com/?p=371#comment-3391 I think Lias may be misleading the public a little. According to the Washington Secretary of state CharityUSA.com LLC took in more lick 11 million and only passed along 16% to the charities in Question. The following financial information has been provided to the Office of the Secretary of State by the above-named organization. Figures are for the organization's fiscal year ending Jun 30, 2007. Contributions $11,280,900. Amount to Charity Clients $1,724,030 According to the financial information shown at left, 16% of the contributions raised by this organization were returned to or retained by the charity client(s). Yes they did pass 1.7mil to Greatergood and Greatergood did distrubute 100% of the 1.7mil but lisa and the rest of the people at Charity USA made a good buck, off of filling our email boxes with SPAM. I think Lias may be misleading the public a little. According to the Washington Secretary of state CharityUSA.com LLC took in more lick 11 million and only passed along 16% to the charities in Question.
The following financial information has been provided to the Office of the Secretary of State by the above-named organization. Figures are for the organization’s fiscal year ending Jun 30, 2007.

Contributions $11,280,900.
Amount to Charity Clients $1,724,030

According to the financial information shown at left, 16% of the contributions raised by this organization were returned to or retained by the charity client(s).

Yes they did pass 1.7mil to Greatergood and Greatergood did distrubute 100% of the 1.7mil but lisa and the rest of the people at Charity USA made a good buck, off of filling our email boxes with SPAM.

]]>